请教，关于美国final OA，请帮忙看一下

审查意见中主要指出以下几个问题

                            Priority
1，Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Taiwan on 10/20/2006. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the application as required by 35 U.S.C. 119(b).

请问这个是让申请人做些什么呢？

                        Claim Rejections-35USC 112
2, Claims1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention.

请问这里的“enablement”和中国的无法实施有什么关联吗？还是它们说的是相同的事情。

                        Claim Rejections-35 USC 103
3, This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential 35 U.S.C. 102(e),(f),or (g) prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(a).

请问审查员是想让申请人做些什么呢？

本人目前对US答辩还不算太熟练，还有很多东西需要学习，麻烦大家帮忙指点一下。
上面的问题如果仅能回答出一个也请不吝提出。

谢谢

Priority
1，Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Taiwan on 10/20/2006. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the application as required by 35 U.S.C. 119(b).

请问这个是让申请人做些什么呢？
这个是要求申请人在答复时递交优证文件。

Priority
1，Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Taiwan on 10/20/2006. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the application as required by 35 U.S.C. 119(b).

请问这个是让申请人做些什么呢？

首先这个是说您这个专利在美国申请时要求了一个台湾专利的优先权，根据美国相关法，要提交优先权文件副本

Claim Rejections-35USC 112
2, Claims1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention.

请问这里的“enablement”和中国的无法实施有什么关联吗？还是它们说的是相同的事情。

再者，这个我的理解是权利要求1-10的部分技术点在说明书中没有描述清楚，使得本技术领域的人员或者相关技术领域的人员无法依照说明书实施或使用该专利。这个我i想可以从说明书中再找些技术点修改完善下权利要求，或者你认为权力已经够清楚了，那就和审查员争辩下。

Claim Rejections-35 USC 103
3, This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential 35 U.S.C. 102(e),(f),or (g) prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(a).

请问审查员是想让申请人做些什么呢？
这个我的理解是：该专利有多个发明人，发明人不止一个时，可能加入参与发明过程的时间就不同。审查员要求申请人明确各发明人对各权利要求技术点参与发明的时间，也就是说提交类似声明的东西，是符合美国相关法的必要材料。最简单的方法，你可以出具一个证明文件，声明所有发明人是同时参与发明的。但是这个我不太确定，以前没碰到过，你可以咨询一下外方的意见。

以上是我个人的简单看法，不太成熟，希望能帮上你！

到这个阶段应该不能再提交优先权证明文件了吧。在中国是这样的。在美国不大清楚。

如果不能提交优先权证明文件了，就是说不能享受优先权了。

你们没有找美国所？

Claim Rejections-35 USC 103
3, This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 103Angel, the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103Coffee and potential 35 U.S.C. 102Envelope,Rose,or Present prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103Angel.

请问审查员是想让申请人做些什么呢？

審查員只是告訴申請人他是把所有的claim 都當成是所有的發明人共同想出來的, 如果不是如同審查員所假設的情況, 則請申請人要告訴審查員哪些claim 分別屬於哪些發明人的貢獻.....

申請人有要用到102a by others; 102e by another 的話再考慮這點

感谢大家的回复，非常有帮助。
谢谢