no comparable mandate in the patent statute that relates the claim scope of non-§ 112paragraph 6 claims to particular matter found in the specification
————这句话出自美国专利审查指南。有人明白这句话的意思吗？
上下文是这样的：
Thus, absent an express recitation of “means for” or “step for” in the limitation, the broadest reasonable interpretation will not be limited to “corresponding structure…and equivalents thereof.” Morris, 127 F.3d at 1055, 44 USPQ2d at 1028 (“no comparable mandate in the patent statute that relates the claim scope of non-§ 112paragraph 6 claims to particular matter found in the specification”).
多谢各位！ |
|
