nigerose 发表于 2011-7-10 23:07:12

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

zls0 wrote:
给个例子，见识一下。


http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20100056797/claims.html

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the alkaline azide is selected from sodium azide, potassium azide, more preferably sodium azide.

5. The process according to claim 4, wherein aromatic hydrocarbons selected from benzene, toluene, xylenes more preferably o-xylene.

6. The process according to claim 4, wherein the polar aprotic organic solvent employed is selected from dimethylformamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone, more preferably dimethylformamide.

ixusi 发表于 2011-7-11 00:01:59

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

nigerose wrote:
http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20100056797/claims.html

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the alkaline azide is selected from sodium azide, potassium azide, more preferably sodium azide.

5. The process according to claim 4, wherein aromatic hydrocarbons selected from benzene, toluene, xylenes more preferably o-xylene.

6. The process according to claim 4, wherein the polar aprotic organic solvent employed is selected from dimethylformamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone, more preferably dimethylformamide.


在中国这样写是不行的。

zls0 发表于 2011-7-11 05:42:57

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法？

more perferably 更优选

已说过，在中国只能在说明书中用，
权利要求中不允许用，如果用，造成保护范围不清楚，坚持用是要驳回的。

清辰 发表于 2011-7-13 18:36:03

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

nigerose wrote:
http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20100056797/claims.html

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the alkaline azide is selected from sodium azide, potassium azide, more preferably sodium azide.

5. The process according to claim 4, wherein aromatic hydrocarbons selected from benzene, toluene, xylenes more preferably o-xylene.

6. The process according to claim 4, wherein the polar aprotic organic solvent employed is selected from dimethylformamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone, more preferably dimethylformamide.


请教一下“more preferably“，保护范围怎么确定

nigerose 发表于 2011-7-13 19:40:51

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

清辰 wrote:
请教一下“more preferably“，保护范围怎么确定


你去问美国人吧。

mcdull 发表于 2011-7-14 19:31:04

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

说的是中文，为啥整英文？
并且，有人这么写就说明一定是正确、可以接受的吗

nigerose wrote:
http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20100056797/claims.html

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the alkaline azide is selected from sodium azide, potassium azide, more preferably sodium azide.

5. The process according to claim 4, wherein aromatic hydrocarbons selected from benzene, toluene, xylenes more preferably o-xylene.

6. The process according to claim 4, wherein the polar aprotic organic solvent employed is selected from dimethylformamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone, more preferably dimethylformamide.

nigerose 发表于 2011-7-14 20:00:51

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

mcdull wrote:
说的是中文，为啥整英文？
并且，有人这么写就说明一定是正确、可以接受的吗


大家只是用中文在谈话，并没有指明一定是中国的专利申请。
我只是提供一点信息，正确与否大家来判断（上面已经有人判断了）。没必要再纠缠。

qiyao002 发表于 2011-7-19 05:24:44

Re:专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法

谢谢前辈们的指点
页: 1 [2]
查看完整版本: 专利申请文件有没有“更优选地”这种说法